You voluntarily lose 10% of your income for five years. If 60% of people agree to the same sacrifice, a major environmental problem is permanently solved. If the threshold isn't reached, you still lose the money.

if i have to lose money either way, i want it to actually mean something. 60% feels achievable if people get honest about it

depends if were talking real environmental gains or carbon accounting theater. if its legit, sure, pay

the real question is whether the 60% threshold is high enough to exclude bad actors or low enough to be realistic. both matter

the tragedy here is that people wont cooperate even when the math works. wed all do it if everyone else did